Performance

Performance Standards

Performance IndicatorMeasureKey InputsExternal ReferencesGovernance
1.1 All students, regardless of their mode or location of study, have the opportunity to provide feedback on the quality of their learning experience

SEQ or equivalent administered across all teaching locations

ISB reports

Student Charter HES 5.3.5 UEC> Academic Senate
1.2 UOW systematically collects and analyses data and uses it to improve the overall student experience, including the online student experience

SEQ/ISB/CEQ Reports

CSO Reports
Procedure for Monitoring Comparative Student Outcomes (CSO) HES 5.3.7 UEC> Academic Senate
1.3 UOW closes the feedback loop by communicating to students regularly about changes made in response to their feedback

Subject Outline audit

UOW website information
Subject Outlines - UEC> Academic Senate
Performance IndicatorMeasureKey InputsExternal ReferencesGovernance
2.1 UOW compares attrition rates by course, student cohort, mode and location of study as a means to improve retention and assure equivalence

UOW attrition rates over time

Annual Reviews of Collaborative Delivery

Collaborative Delivery Annual Review Procedures

HES 1.3.5

Department of Education and Training Selected Higher Education Statistics
UEC> Academic Senate
2.2 UOW compares progression rates by course, student cohort, mode and location of study as a means to improve progression and assure equivalence

UOW progression rates over time

Annual Reviews of Collaborative Delivery
Collaborative Delivery Annual Review Procedures

HES 1.3.5

Department of Education and Training Selected Higher Education Statistics
UEC> Academic Senate
2.3 UOW compares retention and progression rates with other comparable institutions

UOW rates are higher than the sector average (IPP reports)

Annual Reviews of Collaborative Delivery

Collaborative Delivery Annual Review Procedures
KPIs
Institutional Performance Portfolio Report

Department of Education and Training Selected Higher Education Statistics UEC> Academic Senate
Performance IndicatorMeasureKey InputsExternal ReferencesGovernance

3.1 Information on the performance of student cohorts by entry pathway, entry level, and mode of study and location of study is reported and monitored on a sessional basis

CSO Data Reports distributed

Faculty Monitoring reports received; issues followed-up
Procedure for Monitoring Comparative Student Outcomes (CSO)

HES 1.3.6

EPAQ> UEC> Academic Senate
Performance IndicatorMeasureKey InputsExternal ReferencesGovernance
4.1 Assurance of learning is undertaken to assess students against course and subject learning outcomes

Curriculum mapping

CEQ data

Course Design Procedures

Course Review Procedures

Teaching and Assessment: Assessment & Feedback Policy

HES 1.4.3

Australian Qualifications Framework

OLT Hunters and Gatherers Project (assuringlearning.com)
FEC> UEC> Academic Senate
Performance IndicatorMeasureKey InputsExternal ReferencesGovernance
5.1 UOW graduate outcomes compare favourably to the sector as a whole

GDS and ESS results over time

GDS and ESS results compared with benchmarking group and national average for sector

Institutional Performance Portfolio Report

Employer Satisfaction Survey
HES 5.3.4 UEC> Academic Senate
5.2 Employers report a high level of satisfaction with UOW graduates Employer Satisfaction Survey - - UEC> Academic Senate
5.3 UOW has a strong and active alumni network

No of “active” alumni

Attendance at Alumni functions
UOW Strategic Plan - VCAG
Performance IndicatorMeasureKey InputsExternal ReferencesGovernance
6.1 All staff, regardless of their employment status (full-time or part-time, permanent or casual) or location, have the opportunity to provide feedback on the quality of learning and teaching at UOW

Workplace Survey – Your Voice

- HES 5.3.6 UEC> Academic Senate
6.2 All Learning and Teaching committees review their performance and work plans regularly to ensure opportunity for member input and feedback

Committee Minutes

Reporting against work plans

Annual L&T report to Council

UOW Strategic Plan

UOW Gold Standard Committee Service
HES 6.3.1 FECs, EPAQ > UEC> Academic Senate
Performance IndicatorMeasureKey InputsExternal ReferencesGovernance
7.1 All teaching is evaluated on a regular basis at the subject and course level and all teachers have the opportunity to review feedback on their teaching

Individual Performance Reviews

School and faculty reports

Teacher Evaluation Procedures

SES Procedure and Guidelines

HES 5.3.6 UEC> Academic Senate

7.2 Review and improvement activities are informed by regular external referencing against comparable courses of study at other institutions

National and International rankings (for L&T)

Benchmarking outcomes

UOW Benchmarking Policy

WATTLE Fellows
HES 5.3.1 UEC> Academic Senate