Description
To identify the existing evidence regarding researcher distress when undertaking sensitive research, this project will enable one student to identify a research question and develop a project protocol.
The student will then follow their own scoping review protocol to search and screen existing evidence, extract data and synthesise the findings.
The scoping review will be conducted following the methodological framework proposed by Arksey and O’Malley (2005), with enhancements from Levac et al. 2010 and guidance from the PRISMA-ScR checklist (Tricco et a. 2018). The process involved the following stages:
- Identifying the Research Question
A clear and focused research question was developed to guide the scope and objectives of the review. This question determined the inclusion criteria and search strategy.
- Identifying Relevant Studies
A comprehensive search strategy was designed in consultation with a librarian or information specialist. Multiple databases (e.g., PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) were searched using predefined keywords and Boolean operators. Grey literature and reference lists of included studies were also screened.
- Study Selection
Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to screen titles and abstracts, followed by full-text review. Screening was conducted independently by two reviewers, with discrepancies resolved through discussion or a third reviewer.
- Charting the Data
A data extraction form was developed to capture relevant information from each study, including author, year, country, study design, population, intervention/exposure, outcomes, and key findings.
- Collating, Summarizing, and Reporting the Results
Extracted data were synthesized using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. Results were presented in tables and narrative form, highlighting patterns, gaps, and areas for future research.
- Consultation (Optional but Recommended)
Stakeholders or experts in the field were consulted to validate findings, provide insights, and enhance the relevance of the review.
References
Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5, 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., et al. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850