UOW Policy Documents
Policy Documents at a Glance
Writing & Reviewing Policy
CORRUPTION PREVENTION POLICY
Date approved |
15 July 2003 |
Date Policy will take effect |
Immediately |
Date of Next Review |
20 June 2005 |
Approved by |
Administrative Committee | ||||
Custodian title & e-mail address |
Manager, Internal Audit | ||||
Author |
|||||
Responsible Faculty/ |
Internal Audit, Vice Chancellor’s Unit | ||||
Supporting documents, procedures & forms of this policy |
Close Personal Relationships Guidelines | ||||
References & Legislation |
Independent Commission Against Corruption Act, 1988 (NSW) | ||||
Audience |
Public – accessible to anyone | ||||
Expiry date of Policy |
Not applicable | ||||
- Contents
- 1 Purpose of Policy 2
- 2 Definitions 2
- 3 Application & Scope 2
- 4 Policy Principles 2
- 5 Roles & Responsibilities 3
- 6 Version Control and Change History 3
1 Purpose of Policy
- 1. The purpose of this policy is to provide the University with an overarching framework upon which to build a corruption resistant culture.
- 2. The University is committed to high ethical standards and the principles of public duty. The University’s Guiding Principles, as stated in the Strategic Plan, include commitments to:
- a. high ethical standards including accuracy, honesty, cooperation, tolerance, and acceptance of obligations as well as rights; and
- b. accountability to students, the University community, the public and governments.
- 3. Unethical behaviour can cause damage to the University’s reputation and image. Corruption prevention strategies demonstrate ‘due care and diligence’ and assist the University in achieving its objectives.
2 Definitions
Word/Term |
Definition (with examples if required) |
Corrupt conduct |
Corrupt conduct is where a staff member: • Adversely affect the honest impartial exercise of University function; • Is dishonest or partial in the exercise of official functions, eg. awarding a purchase contract to a friend or relative; • Breaches standards of honesty or public trust by activities that use University facilities inappropriately; and/or • Misuses information or material for the gain. |
3 Application & Scope
- 1. The complex operating environment of the University and increasing regulatory requirements means that the risk of fraud and corruption is ever present. The following are some of the factors that add to this risk:
- a. increased technology, complexity and competition;
- b. greater need to allocate scarce resources;
- c. tighter timeframes and deadlines;
- d. changes in government funding; and
- e. ventures into new markets and areas of operation
4 Policy Principles
- 1. The University has adopted a three faceted strategy to building a corruption resistant culture. The groupings provide a framework for an overall strategy focussed on reinforcing a corruption resistant culture and minimising opportunities for corrupt behaviour.
- 1.1. Increase awareness of University Guiding Principles of high ethical standards including accuracy, honesty, and accountability expected of members of the University community;
- 1.2. Minimise corruption by promotion, development and implementation of appropriate policies, procedures mechanisms and controls; and
- 1.3. Facilitate detection, reporting and investigation of corrupt activities.
5 Roles & Responsibilities
Obligations for Staff
- 1. All staff members should incorporate this corruption resistance framework into activities for which they are responsible. This includes:
- a. Incorporating reminders to staff and students of their obligations to ethical conduct and public duties into policies; appointment letters, guidelines; training; and student and/or staff communications;
- b. Implementing risk management practices and procedures designed to minimise the likelihood of corrupt activities such as: regular monitoring of activities; reporting systems; random data checks; segregation of duties; adequate supervision; record keeping; and documentation;
- c. Facilitation of detection of corrupt conduct by:
- i. implementation of controls such as those referred to above;
- ii. implementation of mechanisms designed to facilitate the reporting of suspected or known instances of corruption in the University;
- iii. appropriate reporting or investigation of all instances of suspected or known instances of fraud or corruption.
Obligations for Manager, Internal Audit
- 2. Minimisation of corruption and development of a corruption resistance culture is an obligation of all staff members of the University. Progress will be monitored by the Manager, Internal Audit.
6 Version Control and Change History
Version Control |
Date Effective |
Approved By |
Amendment |
1 |
15 July 2003 |
Administrative Committee |
First Version |
2 |
6 May 2009 |
Vice Principal (Administration) |
Migrated to UOW Policy Template as per Policy Directory Refresh |
Policy Directory Search
Ask for Help
Click here for information on how to contact the Policy and Governance Unit for advice and assistance on policy issues.

