UOW
Excellence - Innovation - Diversity
University of Wollongong
Site Search
Advanced Search  
School of Psychology
Skip navigation
About the School
Information for Students
Research
Facilities & Services
 
 
 

SUPERVISEE QUESTIONNAIRE PACKAGE FOR UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG STUDENTS (Pg 2)

Your code

Number of letters in your surname 1st letter of your mother's 1st name Number of letters in your 1st name Last letter of your 1st name

Supervisor evaluation

Use the following scale to evaluate the supervision you received by your primary supervisor. Use NA for items that were definitely not applicable, or for information you don't know.

1. Overall, the supervisor provided me with high quality supervision
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all, strongly disagree     moderately, neutral     very much so, strongly agree
 
2. Overall, my expectations were matched or exceeded
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all, strongly disagree     moderately, neutral     very much so, strongly agree
 
3. The supervisor organized and managed supervision efficiently
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all, strongly disagree     moderately, neutral     very much so, strongly agree
 
4. I would gladly recommend this supervisor to others
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all, strongly disagree     moderately, neutral     very much so, strongly agree
 
6. The supervision significantly enhanced my competencies as a therapist and professional
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all, strongly disagree     moderately, neutral     very much so, strongly agree
 
7. Supervision objectives (goals) were negotiated and clearly articulated
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all, strongly disagree     moderately, neutral     very much so, strongly agree
 
8. The supervisor was caring and supportive
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all, strongly disagree     moderately, neutral     very much so, strongly agree
 
9. The supervision sessions enhanced my self awareness as a person
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all, strongly disagree     moderately, neutral     very much so, strongly agree
 
10. The supervisor was competent at enhancing my skills development
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all, strongly disagree     moderately, neutral     very much so, strongly agree
 
11. Supervision methods were varied to match supervision objectives
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all, strongly disagree     moderately, neutral     very much so, strongly agree
 
12. The supervisor was approachable and interested in my personal development
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all, strongly disagree     moderately, neutral     very much so, strongly agree
 
13. The supervision advanced my therapist-client relationship skills
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all, strongly disagree     moderately, neutral     very much so, strongly agree
 
14. The supervisor impressed me as a skilled therapist
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all, strongly disagree     moderately, neutral     very much so, strongly agree
 
15. Supervision sessions were structured and supervision activities were goal driven
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all, strongly disagree     moderately, neutral     very much so, strongly agree
 
16. The supervisor was accepting of my mistakes and inadequacies
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all, strongly disagree     moderately, neutral     very much so, strongly agree
 
17. The supervisor enhanced my abilities to reflect on my clinical work
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all, strongly disagree     moderately, neutral     very much so, strongly agree
 
18. The supervisor was knowledgeable and could communicate theoretical concepts clearly
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all, strongly disagree     moderately, neutral     very much so, strongly agree
 
19. The supervision plan appropriately reflected important clinical competencies
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all, strongly disagree     moderately, neutral     very much so, strongly agree
 
20. In day-to-day dealings, I got along well with the supervisor
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all, strongly disagree     moderately, neutral     very much so, strongly agree
 
21. The supervisor helped me gain an understanding of my emotional reactions within therapy
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all, strongly disagree     moderately, neutral     very much so, strongly agree
 
22. The supervisor efficiently used skills training methods (e.g., demonstration, role play) as appropriate
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all, strongly disagree     moderately, neutral     very much so, strongly agree
 
23. Supervision objectives were in accordance with my level of professional development
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all, strongly disagree     moderately, neutral     very much so, strongly agree
 
24. The supervisor was understanding and open to a sharing of ideas
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all, strongly disagree     moderately, neutral     very much so, strongly agree
 
25. The supervision furthered my understanding of my own positive and negative interaction patterns with clients
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all, strongly disagree     moderately, neutral     very much so, strongly agree
 
26. When appropriate, the supervisor shared insights into and offered useful suggestions concerning case management
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all, strongly disagree     moderately, neutral     very much so, strongly agree
 
27. I felt comfortable discussing my professional inadequacies in supervision.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all, strongly disagree     moderately, neutral     very much so, strongly agree
 
28. The supervisor was sensitive to my emotional and self care needs
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all, strongly disagree     moderately, neutral     very much so, strongly agree
 
29. The supervisor's theoretical approach was compatible with mine
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all, strongly disagree     moderately, neutral     very much so, strongly agree
 
30. Supervision helped to inspire me and to remain excited about my clinical work and professional responsibilities
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all, strongly disagree     moderately, neutral     very much so, strongly agree
 
31. The supervisor honoured his/her time commitments to my supervision
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all, strongly disagree     moderately, neutral     very much so, strongly agree
 
32. Supervision facilitated emotional ventilation and support as appropriate
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all, strongly disagree     moderately, neutral     very much so, strongly agree
 
33. Formal assessment tasks were well planned and sequenced
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all, strongly disagree     moderately, neutral     very much so, strongly agree
 
34. Ethical and professional issues were covered as relevant
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all, strongly disagree     moderately, neutral     very much so, strongly agree
 
35. Formal assessment tasks adequately captured important clinical competencies
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all, strongly disagree     moderately, neutral     very much so, strongly agree
36. Had you been instructed to complete the above questionnaire under the proviso that your supervisor got a copy of these ratings with your name on it AFTER they had assessed your placement performance, would your ratings change to portray the supervisor (circle one)
1. Much more positively
2. Moderately more positively
3. Slightly more positively
4. No change to ratings
5. More negatively
 
   

Last reviewed: 10 September, 2007 

 
   
 
Faculty of Health & Behavioural Sciences
University of Wollongong
Wollongong NSW 2522 Australia
Telephone +61 2 4221 3492 		  CRICOS Provider No: 00102E
Privacy, Disclaimer and Copyright Info 2003
Feedback: hbs_web@uow.edu.au