Shuttle Cars are electrically powered by alternating current (a.c.) through a trailing cable. Some models now feature onĀ
board thyristor conversion to direct current (d.c.) for the wheel drive motors to give better speed control but many use a.c. two or three speed drive motors for simplicity, albeit with jerky starting.
Payloads vary from four to twenty tonne depending on the height of the working place and size of the unit and operating reach is determined by the maximum amount of cable which can be accommodated on the shuttle cars cable reel drum, usually about 150 m. By back spooling of cables from an intermediate cable anchorage point the operational reach can be doubled but this may result in reduced cable life and is usually used only for specialised drivages.
To avoid cable tangling as the cars are usually used in pairs with a continuous miner, one car has its cable reel on the left side, the other on the right side. A typical cable layout is as shown on the right.
Wherever practicable the cars are arranged to have different wheeling paths around pillars as this minimises wheeling and shunting delays and reduces cable damage, however in concentrated workings this is not always possible. Where several paths are available then more than two shuttle cars can be used as in South African (RSA) practice where up to six may be used to improve production rates but this is practicable only where the panel is a traditional bord and pillar layout with small pillars and many headings. Such practice is not common in Australia.
Clearly the problems of cable paths and cable damage suggest that independent self-powered cars would be attractive but although several diesel and diesel hydraulic shuttle car types have been used they have not found general acceptance as viable replacements for the electric trailing cable powered cars, largely due to their higher maintenance requirements and increased downtime.
Equally clearly the discontinuous operation of continuous miners is as much due to the batch conveying by shuttle cars as it is to roof support delays. An alternative is continuous conveying. |