Advanced Reactors
"Typical design objectives imply that safety
actions by the operators shall not be needed within
at least 30 minutes, leaving them time to assess
the situation carefully before acting. Increased
thermal inertia in the reactor system and reduced
core power densities are two such design related
factors." (IAEA
website)
Often called Generation III or Generation IV
reactors, advanced reactors are modern nuclear
power reactor designs that are very new (built
in the last 5 or so years), currently being built,
or are in the design/planning stage. They fall
into three general categories (with a few novel
exceptions):
- Water Cooled Advanced Reactors
- Advanced Gas-Cooled Reactors
- Advanced Fast Reactors
Water Cooled Advanced Reactors
These fall into two general categories; light-water
and heavy-water reactors. These all also fall
into one of two subcategories - pressurised water
reactors and boiling water reactors. They are
in principle the same as the older gen I and gen
II designs, except that they employ more advanced
technology and engineering expertise. Currently
most power reactors worldwide are light-water
reactors.
Fuel: Light-water: 3.5% enriched U-235.
Heavy Water: Ordinary Uranium ore (requires no
enrichment as the moderator absorbs so few neutrons).
Moderator: Light-water: Ordinary water.
Heavy Water: Deuterium (D2O). This is water where
the hydrogen atoms also have a neutron in their
nucleus.
Coolant: Light-water: Ordinary water.
Heavy Water: Deuterium (D2O).
Advancements: Both heavy and light-water
advanced reactors contain evolutionary changes,
such as the ability to use mixed oxide fuels (MOX)
to recycle
plutonium (a waste product of most reactors),
employ passive safety features (which depend upon
the unchanging physical properties of materials
instead of man-made fail-safes which may malfunction),
have increased plant lifetime (to ~100 years),
and cost effectiveness.
Example:
Supercritical Water Cooled Reactor (SCWR)
- SCWR follows BWR design, but heats water to
it's critical point rather than boiling it.
- Simplified design - water doesn't change phase
& is ~33% more efficient than LWR's.
- Still in design phase - may be altered to
run with fast neutrons.
Advanced Gas-Cooled Reactors
High temperature gas-cooled reactors (HTGCR's)
have been in operation for some time. They characteristically
have a high thermal efficiency but often require
a high enrichment of fuel (especially for the
initial load). The fuel assemblies have traditionally
consisted of fuel pellets (2-6mm diameter) coated
with a ceramic protective layer dispersed in graphite.
The two foremost advanced gas-cooled designs are
the Pebble Bed Modular Reactor (PBMR) and the
Gas-Turbine Modular Helium Reactor (GTMHR).
Fuel: A mixture of 20% enriched UCO or
ThO fuel in sphere form coated with multiple ceramic
layers or with graphite.
Moderator: Graphite - either as fuel pellets
dispersed in a solid block (GTMHR) or a shell
encapsulating the fuel pellet (PBMR).
Coolant: Helium Gas. As Helium is inert,
it is a suitable choice.
Advancements:
Again, primarily evolutionary changes, such as
improved engineering leading to much grater efficiency,
passive safety features and standardised parts
(to allow more cohesion in the supporting industry).
The advantage of a graphite core is that it cannot
melt down due to graphite's extremely high melting
point.
Example:
Gas-Turbine Modular Helium Reactor (GTMHR)
- Fuel is 20% enriched and dispersed in a graphite
array.
- 16% more efficient than standard LWR's, 1128Mw
electricity output (the average Australian home
uses 6000MwHrs per year). Reduces Uranium consumption
by 35%! Still in design phase.
- Gas turbine coupled directly to the core provides
the extra efficiency.
Advanced Fast Reactors
"Breeder Reactors are capable of satisfying
the electrical energy needs of the world for thousands
of years." (Berkeley
Dept. Of Nuclear Engineering website).
Fast reactors are often called breeder reactors
for their ability to produce more fuel than they
consume. The revolutionary aspect to the design
of fast reactors is that they have no moderator.
Instead of slowing neutrons down, fast neutrons
are employed. All nuclei above Ac on the periodic
table are fissile. Thus fast reactors are of profound
significance to any nuclear fuel cycle being developed,
as the quote from Berkeley University above points
out. U-235, like oil and coal is a finite resource;
and many estimates put a timeframe of 50 years
before all the U-235 on the planet runs out, were
the whole world to turn to nuclear power as their
primary power source. It is the unique ability
of fast reactors to run on not only unenriched
uranium, but also on the spent fuel of other reactors
that makes them so handy. Fast reactors extract
60 times as much energy from fuel than other reactors.
Fuel: Varies. Can run on depleted fuel
from other reactors.
Moderator: None! Neutrons are not required
to slow down.
Coolant: Traditionally liquid sodium.
Sodium does not appreciably show down neutrons,
has excellent thermal properties, and has a high
boiling point (allows reactor to be operated at
lower pressures). Unfortunately, in the process
of running the reactor the sodium becomes radioactive.
Also sodium reacts violently with water and catches
fire when in contact with air, which leads to
engineering difficulties.
Advancements: Newer uranium (or plutonium)
carbide fuels allow potentially for greater fuel
efficiency. Pool designs emerging allow
use of passive safety features, lower radiation
doses for workers, and longer intervals before
refuelling is necessary (reactors often have to
shutdown to refuel). Liquid lead coolant overcomes
engineering problems with liquid sodium (though
creates new health risk for workers - heavy metal).
Example:
Lead Cooled Fast Reactor (LCFR)
- Still in design stage, envisioned to run on
depleted fuel.
- Pool type - liquid lead cools by convection
- passive safety feature.
- Designed for very long interval before refuelling-
15 to 20 years!
The Future?
More radical designs exist that envision things
such as a molten salt (liquid) fuel that circulates
through the reactor (Molten Salt Reactor), or
even a reactor that requires a beam of high energy
protons to be fired into it to maintain criticality
- otherwise the reaction would stop (Subcritical
Proton Accelerator Driven Reactor). Practically,
these designs - although fascinating - have little
to no chance of ever being implemented. Future
use of nuclear energy is contingent on overcoming
proliferation and spent fuel issues in the public's
eyes. Fast reactors present us with a real opportunity
of at least addressing the proliferation issue.
|