Peer Review

The process for formal peer observation of teaching

Before requesting a peer observation, attendance at a UOW workshop on peer review of teaching is highly recommended.

1.

Reviewee selects reviewer from UOW list and contacts to request a review.
ownarrow - cedir - peer review process

2.

Reviewer and reviewee meet and discuss teaching context and pro forma reviewee has selected.
Both sign the Peer Observation Request Form and the reviewee returns it to Teaching Services.
ownarrow - cedir - peer review process

3.

Reviewer observes class at agreed time and place and records notes on agreed focus areas from the pro forma.
ownarrow - cedir - peer review process

4.

Reviewer types up their Observation Feedback, provides a copy to the reviewee and meets with reviewee to discuss.
ownarrow - cedir - peer review process

5.

Reviewer writes their Evaluation Summary independently of the reviewee.
Reviewer lodges the evaluation summary with Teaching Services within two weeks of the observation. After lodgment, reviewer provides a copy to the reviewee.
ownarrow - cedir - peer review process

6.

Optional: for probation or promotion, reviewee decides on two peer review Evaluation Summaries (one internal and one external to the faculty) to be sent to the Committee. Reviewee writes reflective commentary on all evidence of teaching.
ownarrow - cedir - peer review process

7.

Peer review Evaluation Summaries if requested by the reviewee are sent to Committee with teacher evaluations and ULT completion report.

 

Either person may decline or withdraw at any point in the process.

Last reviewed: 25 October, 2011

Feedback

We value your feedback together with any suggestions you may have on how we can improve the services we deliver.

If you have any comments or suggestions, please submit them here:
Feedback