|
Vulnerability
of Children
International
Research
Australian
Testing
Variability
in Tests
References
Vulnerability
of Children
The findings
that heavy metals can be dislodged from CCA-treated timber has raised
concerns about the health impacts of this on children. This is because
children are especially vulnerable due to:
- their
hand-to-mouth behaviour which can transfer the heavy metals into
their bodies both during and after play (CPSC, 2003a),
- their
close contact with treated timber structures when playing in backyard
cubby houses and crawling and sitting on decks,
- their
faster metabolic rate (Belluck et al, 2003).
There is
a lack of direct health studies to determine how arsenic affects
children so extrapolations have to be made from studies on adults
or rats. Currently, risk assessment is undertaken to determine the
lethal dose for 50 percent of rats (LD50), and this is then extrapolated
to an 80 kilogram male adult, and further extrapolations have to
be made for a child. As Jo Immig of the APVMA’s Community
Consultative Committee remarked, ‘children are the most vulnerable
in our society, and health standards needs to be calculated to protect
them’ (Pers. Comm, 22/11/04).
Belluck
et al (2003) warn that infants and children may be more susceptible
than adults to arsenic exposure, with ingestion of soil as the main
pathway for arsenic intake. Another means of exposure is through
children handling treated timber play equipment and then putting
their arsenic-coated hands in their mouths. Children living near
industrial and hazardous waste sites may also be at risk through
dust inhalation. The health symptoms experienced by children exposed
to high levels of arsenic have been found to be similar to adults,
and including respiratory, cardiovascular, dermal and neurological
effects.

International
Research
A number
of overseas studies have been undertaken to find out the amount
of arsenic, chromium and copper that can be dislodged and ingested
from contact with CCA-treated timber. The amounts of arsenic dislodged
from CCA-treated timber varies from study to study. The table below
displays some of this information for ease of comparison.
| Source |
Finding |
| Sharp
and Walker (2001) |
‘A
4-6 year old child’s daily exposure to arsenic has been
found to be 5 micrograms/l in food, 23 µg/L in water,
25 µg/L from playing on CCA-treated wood and up to 480
µg/L from playing on CCA treated playground equipment’
(p.1). Children could exceed the legally-acceptable lifetime
cancer risk in 2 weeks by paying on a treated play set. |
| Anon
(2004) |
7
of 20 play areas in Central Park, New York tested positive for
arsenic above safe levels. The highest reading (316.6 µg)
is a 1-in-500 lifetime risk of lung or bladder cancer if playing
there three hours a week from ages 1 to 6. The play equipment
was all regularly painted or sealed with polyurethane. |
| Sharp
et. al. (2001) |
Wipe
tests the size of an average four-year-old child’s hand
found 18 to 1,020 µg arsenic, more than the US EPA’s
proposed 10 µg per day allowable exposure level for arsenic
in drinking water. It was estimated that 1 in 500 children regularly
playing on treated play sets will develop lung or bladder cancer
in later life due to this exposure. |
| Lerche
Davis (2003) |
‘In
the US’ southern states, 10% of all children face a cancer
risk that is 100 times higher because they spend more time outdoors
playing’. |
| Kwon
et al (2004) |
The
mean amount of arsenic on children’s hands from CCA-treated
playgrounds was 0.50 µg, significantly higher than the
control mean amount of 0.095 µg. The maximum amount logged,
however, was less than the Canadian allowable daily intake of
arsenic (4 µg) in water and food. |
| Enviros
Consulting et al (2003) |
Sand
from sand playboxes built from treated wood contained a maximum
of 12.9 mg arsenic per kilogram of sand 2 to 4 years after construction.
Natural soils may contain from 1 to 50 mg arsenic/kg. Little
risk to children being poisoned by eating the sand. |
The Consumer
Product Safety Commission also conducted peer-reviewed scientific
studies of exposure to arsenic via playground equipment. Their scientists
found that ‘exposure to arsenic from CCA-treated playgrounds
could be a significant source of arsenic’ for children (CPSC,
2003a). They estimated that children between 2 and 6 years old who
play regularly on CCA-treated playground equipment have a significantly
increased lung or bladder cancer risk over their lifetimes (CPSC
2003b: 1).

Australian
testing
In Australia,
children are likely to spend more time outdoors playing on treated
timber equipment than in many northern industrialised nations because
of the warmer more temperate climate. However, Australian authorities
have been remiss in not carrying out any soil or wipe test in children’s
playgrounds. The only known published residue testing carried out
in Australia since CCA-treated timber was put on the market was
a limited wipe test on playground equipment in the City of Maroondah,
Victoria. The tests were commissioned by the Croydon Conservation
Society and undertaken by the State Chemistry Laboratory, in June
2003. Noting that the maximum safe amounts of arsenic in Australia
for a 12kg child is 3.4 µ/day, the results showed a range
of 21 µg to 710 µg from a single wipe, compared to a
background control of less than 0.1 µg (See Table 2.3 below).
These amounts available to children from contact with the CCA-treated
timber far exceed the maximum amount of arsenic allowed in a glass
of drinking water (Loveridge, 2004b).
Results
from wipe-testing of playground equipment in City of Maroondah
| Sample |
Total
Arsenic (µg) |
Total
Chromium (µg) |
Total
Copper (µg) |
| 1 |
21 |
22 |
20 |
| 2 |
24 |
23 |
22 |
| 3 |
91 |
190 |
88 |
| 4 |
140 |
630 |
140 |
| 5 |
710 |
310 |
670 |
| Control |
<0.1 |
<0.6 |
<0.2 |
Source:
Loveridge, 2004

Variability
in tests
As described
in more detail in the section on Environmental
Impacts, there are a number of factors that control the level
of dislodgement, or leaching from CCA-treated timber, including:
- acidity
of the wood and surrounding soil,
- UV
exposure, and
- amount
of weathering to the wood.
Some
of these factors contribute to the range of heavy metal levels found
to wipe off during testing.

References:
Anon,
(2004), ‘Playground Poison’, The New York Post,
August 15.
Belluck,
D., Benjamin, S., Baveye, P., Sampson, J., and Johnson, B. (2003),
‘Widespread Arsenic Contamination of Soils in Residential
Areas and Public Spaces: An Emerging Regulatory or Medical Crisis?’,
International Journal of Toxicology, 22, pp. 109-128.
CPSC
(2003a), Fact Sheet: Chromated Copper Arsenate (CCA) -Treated
Wood Used in Playground Equipment, U.S. Consumer Product
Safety Commission, February 7, http://www.cpsc.gov,
(accessed 16/8/04)
CPSC
(2003b), Briefing Package: Petition to Ban Chromated Copper
Arsenate (CCA)-Treated Wood in Playground Equipment (Petititon
Hp 01-3). Washington, DC: US Consumer Product Safety Commission
(CPSC). February.
Enviros
Consulting and The BioComposites Centre, University of Wales (2004),
Treated Wood Waste: Assessment of the Waste Management Challenge,
The Waste & Resources Action Programme (WRAP), UK.
Gray,
S. and Houlihan, J. (2002), All Hands on Deck, Washington,
D.C.: Environmental Working Group (EWG). August. http://www.ewg.org/reports/allhandsondeck/AllHandsOnDeck.pdf
Lerche
Davis (2003), ‘Carcinogens in Playsets, Decks, Picnic Tables’,
WebMD Medical News, November 14, http://my.webmd.com/content/article/77/90361.htm?z=3734_00000_1000_ts_02
(accessed 11/11/04).
Kwon,
E., Zhang, H., Wang, Z., Jhangri, G., Lu, X., Fok, N., Gabos,
S., Li, X-F, and Le, X. (2004), ‘Arsenic on the Hands of
Children after Playing in Playgrounds’, Environmental
Health Perspectives, 112:1375–1380.
Loveridge,
K. (2004), Letter to Premier Steve Bracks, April 11.
Sharp,
R. and Walker, B. (2001), Poisoned Playgrounds: Arsenic in
'Pressure-Treated' Wood, Environmental Working Group and
Healthy Building Network, Washington D.C. http://www.ewg.org/reports/poisonedplaygrounds/poisonedplaygrounds.pdf
Sharp,
R. et. al. (2001), The Poisonwood Rivals: High Levels Of Arsenic
Found In Lumber From Home Depot & Lowe's, Environmental
Working Group and Healthy Building Network, Washington D.C. http://www.ewg.org/reports/poisonwoodrivals/poisonwood.pdf

|