Bibliography

Political Philosophy and Policy Process

Anderson, I. , R. Griew, et al. (2003). "Ethics guidelines, health research and indigenous Australians." New Zealand Bioethics Journal February: 20-29.

Annas, G. J. and S. Elias (2004). "Politics, morals and embryos." Nature 431(2 Sept.): 19-20.

Anonymous (2004c). "Voters say yes to stem-cell research." SwissInfo, 29 Nov 2004. http://www.swissinfo.org/sen/Swissinfo.html?siteSect=105&sid=5368713. Date accessed: 2004.

Baker, R. (1998). "A theory of international bioethics: multiculturalism, postmodernism, and the bankruptcy of fundamentalism." Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8(3): 201-31.

Barber, B. (1984). Strong democracy: participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley, University of California.

Barnes, M., A. Knops, et al. (2004). "Recent research – the micro-politics of deliberation: case studies in public participation." Contemporary Politics 10(2): 93-110.

Barnes, M., J. Newman, et al. (2003). "Constituting ‘The Public' in public participation." Public Administration 81(2): 379-399.

Beauchamp, T. L. (1998). "The mettle of moral fundamentalism: a reply to Robert Baker." Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8(4): 389-401.

Benhabib, S. (2002). “Deliberative democracy and multicultural dilemmas.” In Benhabib, S, The claims of culture: equality and diversity in the global era. N J, Princeton University Press.

Black, J. (1998) “Regulation as facilitation: negotiating the genetic revolution” Modern Law Review 61 (5): 621-660.

Bohman, J. (1998). "Survey article: the coming of age of deliberative democracy." Journal of Political Philosophy 6(4): 400-425.

Braun, K. (2002) “Deliberation, Democracy, and Bioethics; How to democratise the politics of biomedicine?” Draft paper presented at the European Consortium for Political Research Workshop, Turin, March 22-27.

Chadwick, R. S., U. (2003). "Tribute to Dorothy Wertz." Bioethics 17(4): v.

Charlesworth (1993). Bioethics in a Liberal Society. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Chopyak, J. and P. Levesque (2002). "Public participation in science and technology decision making: trends for the future." Technology in Society 24(1-2): 155-166.

Cohen, J. (1997). “Deliberation and democratic legitimacy.” In J. Bohman and W. Rehg (eds) Deliberative Democracy: Essays on reason and politics. Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press.

Cohen, J. (1997). Procedure and substance in deliberative democracy. In J. Bohman and w. Rehg (eds) Deliberative democracy: essays on reason and politics. Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press.

Crute, I. H., E.; White, S. (2003). "Influencing scientific research through stakeholder dialogue." Science and Public Affairs June 2003: 14-15.

Dickenson, D. (2003). "Comentary on Malcolm Parker." Monash Bioethics Review 22(1): 22-24.

Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Einsiedel, E. and D. Eastlick (2000). "Consensus conferences as deliberative democracy." Science Communication 21(4): 323-343.

Eisenman, E. (2003). Data collection methods (Appendix). The Nation Bioethics Advisory Commission: Contributing to Public Policy, RAND : 139-43.

Fischer, F. (2003). “Citizens and Experts: democratizing policy deliberation.” In Reframing Public Policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. New York, Oxford University Press.

Fleck, L. (2001). “Deliberative democracy for bioethics: could the web help?” Hastings Centre Report, Hastings Centre.

Friedrich, M. J. (2000). "Debating pros and cons of stem cell research." Journal of the American Medical Association 284(6): 681-2.

Friele, M. B. (2003). "Do committees ru(i)n the bio-political culture? On the democratic legitimacy of bioethics committees." Bioethics 17(4): 301-318.

Fukuyama, F. (2005). "Human biomedicine and the problem of governance." Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 48(2): 195-200.

Gallup (2001). “Four-nation study finds support for controversial treatment: most approve use of human stem cells.” Roy Morgan International.

Garland, M. (1999). "Experts and the public: a needed partnership for genetic policy." Public Understanding of Science 8(3): 241-254.

Gaus, G. (1997). Reason, justification and consensus: why democracy can't have it all. In J. Bohman and W. Rehg. Deliberative democracy: essays on reason and politics. Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press.

Glicken, J. (1999). "Effective Public Involvement in Public Decisions." Science Communication 20(3): 298-327.

Glicken, J. (1999) “Effective Public Involvement in Public Decisions” Science Communication 20 (3) March: 298-327.

Goodin, R. (2003). Democratic deliberation within. In J. Fishkin and P. Laslett. Debating Deliberative Democracy. Malden - Mass, Blackwell Press.

Gutman, A. and D. Thompson (1996). Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

Gutman, A. (2003). Identity in Democracy. Princeton, Princeton University Press.

Hagendijk, R. (2004). "The public understanding of science and public participation in regulated worlds." Minerva 42(1): 41-59.

Halila, R. (2003). "The role of national ethics commissions in Finland." Bioethics 17(4): 357-368.

Hammond, K. R., Mumpower, J., Dennis, R. L., Fitch, S., Crumpacker, W. (1983). "Fundamental obstacles to the use of scientific information in public policy making." Technological forecasting and social change 24: 287-297.

Henriks, C. (2002). "Institutions of deliberative democratic processes and interest groups: Roles, tensions and incentives." Australian Journal of Public Administration 61(1): 64-75.

Irwin, A. (1995). Citizen Science: a study of people, expertise and sustainable development. New York, Routledge.

Irwin, A. (2001). "Constructing the scientific citizen: Science and democracy in the biosciences." Public Understanding of Science 10(1): 1-18.

Irwin, A. (2004) “Expertise and experience in the governance of science: what is public participation for?” In Edmond, G. (ed) Expertise in Regulation and Law Ashgate, UK.

Ivison, D. (2002). Postcolonial Liberalism. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Jasanoff, S. (2003). "Technologies of humility: Citizen participation in governing science." Minerva 41(3): 223-245.

Jennings, B. (2004). "Genetic Literacy and Citizenship: Possibilities for Deliberative Democratic Policymaking in Science and Medicine." The Good Society 13(1): 38-44.

Jones, M. (2004). "Policy legitimation, expert advice, and objectivity: 'opening' the UK governance framework for human genetics." Social Epistemology 18(2-3): 247-70.

King. L. (2003) “Deliberation, Legitimacy, and Multilateral Democracy” Governance 16, (1) January: 23-50.

Kymlicka, W. (1989). Liberalism, Community and Culture. Oxford, Clarendon Press.

Kymlicka, W. (1995). Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford, Clarendon Press.

Lofgren, H., and Benner, M. (2003) “Biotechnology and Governance in Australia and Sweden : Path Dependency or Institutional Convergence?” Australian Journal of Political Science 38 (1): 25-43.

Macintyre, S., Chalmers, I., Horton, R., Smith, R. (2001). "Using evidence to inform health policy: Case study." British Medical Journal 322: 222-225.

Macklin, R. (1988). "Making policy by committee." The Hastings Center Report 18(4): 26.

Macklin, R. (1998). "Ethical relativism in a multicultural society." Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8(1): 1-22.

Macklin, R. (1999). Against Relativism: Cultural Diversity and the Search for Ethical Universals in Medicine. New York, Oxford University Press.

Marston, G., Watts, R. (2003). "Tampering with the evidence: a critical appraisal of evidene-based policy-making." The Drawing Board 3(3): 143-163.

McIntyre, K. M. (1995). "Medicolegal implications of consensus statements." Chest 108(4 Supplement): 502S-505S.

Mercer, D. (2003). "Seen but not heard: can STS shape policy in controversial areas of science? STS 'advice' and (CEMEPHI) the Australian Committee on Electromagnetic Energy Public Health Issues." Science Studies and Public Policy: A Sino-Australian Conversation, University of NSW, Sydney.

Miller, D. (2002). “Deliberative democracy and social choice.” In D. Estlund. (ed) Democracy. Malden, MA, Blackwell publishers.

Mitcham, C. (1997). “Justifying public participation in technical decision making.” Technology and Society Magazine, IEEE. 16 : 40-46.

Moreno, J. D., Meslin, E. M. (2003). "From the guest editors." Bioethics 17(4): iii-iv.

Mulkay, M. (1997) The Embryo Research Debate: Science and the politics of reproduction, Cambridge University Press, UK.

Myser, C. (2004). "Community-based participatory research in United States bioethics: steps toward more democratic theory and policy." The American Journal of Bioethics 4(2): 67-8.

NHMRC (1995). Guidelines for the Development and Implementation of Clinical Practice Guidelines. Canberra, Commonwealth of Australia.

Parker, M. (2003). "Reasoning about embryos, cloning and stem cells: let's get more clear and distinct." Monash Bioethics Review 22(1): 8-17.

Patten, S. (2001). "Democratizing the institutions of policy-making: democratic consultation and participatory administration." Journal of Canadian Studies 35(4): 221-240.

Pelletier, D., V. Kraak, et al. (1999). "The shaping of collective values through deliberative democracy: An empirical study from New York's North Country." Policy Sciences 32(2): 103-131.

Phillips, S. and M. Orsini (2002). “Mapping the Links: Citizen Involvement in Policy Processes.” Canadian Policy Research Networks Discussion Paper. Ottawa.

Rawls, J. (1993). Political Liberalism. New York, Columbia University Press.

Rawls, J. (1997). The idea of public reason. In J. Bohman and W. Rehg. Deliberative democracy: essays on reason and politics. Cambridge, MA , MIT Press.

Rayner, S. (2003). "Democracy in the age of assessment: reflections on the roles of expertise and democracy in public-sector decision making." Science and Public Policy 30(3): 163-170.

Resnik, D. (2001). "Setting Biomedical Research Priorities: Justice, Science, and Public Participation." Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 11(2): 181-204.

Robins, R. (2003). STS and Australian Biotechnology Policy. Science Studies and Public Policy: A Sino-Australian Conversation, University of NSW, Sydney.

Roqueplo, P. (?). GMO: France 's first citizen conference, Trustnet. 2004.

Sandel, M. (1982). Liberalism and the limits of Justice. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Sheldrake, R. (2004). "Public participation: let the people pick projects." Nature 432(18 Nov): 271.

Smith, G. and C. Wales (2000). "Citizens' Juries and Deliberative Democracy." Political Studies 48(1): 51-65.

Spielman, B. (2003). "Should consensus be 'The Commission Method' in the US ? The perspective of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, regulations, and case law." Bioethics 17(4): 341-356.

Stafford, N. (2003). Speech stirs stem cell debate. T. Scientist. 2004.

Sunstein, C. (2003). The law of group polarization. In J. Fishkin and P. Laslett. Debating deliberative democracy. Malden, MA, Blackwell.

Szoke, H. (2002). "The Nanny State or Responsible Government?" Journal of Law and Medicine 9: 470-482.

Taverne, D. (2004). "Let's be sensible about public participation." Nature 432(18 Nov): 271.

Tobin, B. (2003). "Response to Malcolm Parker." Monash Bioethics Review 22(1): 18-21.

Turner, L. (2004). "Bioethics in pluralistic societies." Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 7: 201-8.

van Heyningen, V., Cox, D. R. (2002). "Advice to governments: Scientific give and take." Nature Review Genetics 3: 631-636.

Wachelder, J. (2003). "Democratizing science : various routes and visions of Dutch science shops." Science, Technology & Human Values 28(2): 244-273.

Waldron, J. (1993). Liberal Rights: Collected Papers 1981-1991. New York, Cambridge University Press.

Weale, A. (2001) “Science Advice, Democratic Responsiveness and Public Policy” Science and Public Policy 28 (6): 413-421.

Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, Princeton University Press.

Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Young, I. M. (2001). "Activist challenges to deliberative democracy." Political Theory 29(5): 670-90.

Zwanziger, L. L. (2003). "(forthcoming) Help wanted: Roles for philosophers at interface of science and public policy." DRAFT.