| |
|
Kunapipi XXVI:1
HELEN GILBERT
‘Let them know you have broughtuptcy’:
Childhood and Child-Subjects in Olive Senior’s Short Stories
Critical appraisals of Olive Senior’s fiction seldom fail to highlight
its preoccupation with childhood as a powerful trope through which to
express the personal and social legacies of Jamaica’s colonial history.
This is to be expected given that over two-thirds of the stories in her
three published collections, Summer Lightning (1986), Arrival
of the Snake-Woman (1989) and Discerner of Hearts (1995),
focus on a child’s experience or perspective, or both, with a significant
number of these being told, in whole or in part, by child narrators. Senior’s
particular interest in the vicissitudes of childhood is most readily interpreted
in terms of identity politics. Scholars argue, for example, that her evocative
portraits of marginalised and displaced children exemplify the alienated
subjects of creolisation (see Barratt 270–73; Patteson 19–21);
that her child characters typically face crises of identification that
impel choices between different adult role models representing the apparently
separate worlds of Jamaica’s middle-class and folk cultures (Thieme
90–93); or that her fiction participates in a more broadly practised,
Caribbean literary model in which the ‘omnipresence of the child
narrator or protagonist points to the difficulties of establishing one’s
own voice’ (Misrahi-Barak 71). Autobiographical aspects of Senior’s
writing are often referenced in support of this identity motif as critics
note rough parallels between the author’s Jamaican girlhood and
her (female) characters’ specific situations. These interpretive
paradigms are undoubtedly useful, not only because they illuminate what
Senior herself has described in interviews as a key issue in her work
— ‘the struggle of individuals to affirm themselves’,
to create a sense of self amid ‘chaotic personal and social history’
(1988 482) — but also because they connect her fiction to an important
body of Caribbean writing which has examined childhood experience as part
of the imperative of postcolonial self-definition.1 I wonder, however,
if the identity politics approach, with its ultimate referent being the
adult subject who develops — or will develop — from the child
depicted, obscures a more complex picture of what Senior’s representations
of children/childhood potentially do; what kinds of symbolic management
they reveal as operative in Jamaican society, and what modes of social
critique they enact.
In this essay, I will consider the ways in which children — as the
foci of race, class and gender specific processes in the family, as objects
of regulation and development in school, as targets of religious indoctrination,
as sites of social and sexual anxiety, and as symbols of the future and
what is at stake in ongoing negotiations of cultural (rather than individual)
identity2 — are pivotal in structuring the communities that Senior
sketches. In skewing the focus away from representations of individual
subjectivity, I am inspired by Senior’s stated sense of childhood
as a time/space for making connections to a much larger system: ‘The
kind of existence I lived as a child also made me aware that … individual
life was infinitesimally small in a larger and incomprehensible universe,
in the pull and push of history’ (1988 482). That larger context
is recorded in clinical detail in Working Miracles (1991), Senior’s
sociological survey of women’s lives in the English-speaking Caribbean,
whereas her stories proffer a deliberately partial (in the sense of incomplete
and biased) vision of Jamaican culture. My reading of these texts takes
a lead from an article by Alison Donnell that explores the interface between
the material bodies and cultural practices imaged in Senior’s fiction.
Donnell is somewhat wary of analytical models that stress a celebratory
rhetoric of plural, provisional, syncretic identities in constructing
notions of Caribbeanness. She argues that Senior’s achievement is
to show the cultural tensions and values which ‘remain unresolved’
at the level of the body ‘in theories of creolisation and hybridity’
(1996 40). This critical focus on corporeality has important implications
for a discussion of childhood and the child-subject, which are categories
almost always marked by some notion of physical or behavioural difference
from an adult norm. As I will suggest, it is through the body of the child
as a particularly malleable subject-in-formation that so many forms of
social desire are tacitly negotiated. Senior’s child-centred stories
collectively register and critique these negotiations while simultaneously
raising questions about (Western) models of development, and how they
might relate to narrativity itself in postcolonial contexts.
|